Heat pump vs gas furnace: which is actually cheaper to run
The short version
- A cold climate heat pump at HSPF2 11.0 costs less to run than a 95% AFUE gas furnace in 4 of 45 states, more in 33, with 8 too close to call.
- The threshold is set by your equipment, not by geography. For this pairing it is a price ratio of 2.78 to 1.
- Best states for the heat pump: Arkansas, Hawaii, North Carolina. Worst: Alaska, Michigan, New York.
- Natural gas is the only fuel that regularly beats a heat pump on running cost. Against propane, heating oil, and electric baseboard, the heat pump wins nearly everywhere.
- Running cost is not the whole decision. A heat pump also replaces your air conditioner, which changes the capital comparison considerably.
Against a modern condensing gas furnace, a good cold climate heat pump costs less to run in 4 of 45 states and more in 33. Natural gas is the hardest case a heat pump faces, and most calculators do not tell you that.
The short answer
Using heating season prices for 2025-12, 2026-01, 2026-02, a heat pump rated HSPF2 11.0 with 10% backup heat delivers heat more cheaply than a 95% AFUE condensing gas furnace in 4 states. In 33 states the furnace is cheaper. In 8 the two are within 10% of each other, which is a tie once you allow for how much fuel prices move between seasons.
That result surprises people, because the overwhelming majority of published heat pump calculators return a saving for everyone. Two things explain the gap. Most use a single national average fuel price rather than your state. Many also read the most recent monthly EIA gas figure, which in summer runs up to double the winter number for reasons that have nothing to do with the commodity.
How the comparison actually works
Every heating system is a machine for turning purchased energy into heat in your house. The only question that matters for running cost is how many dollars it takes to put one kilowatt hour of heat into the room.
A combustion appliance burns fuel and loses some of it up the flue. Its AFUE rating is the share that reaches the house, so an appliance rated 95% delivers 95 cents of heat for every dollar of fuel. It can never exceed 100%.
A heat pump does not make heat. It moves heat that already exists in the outdoor air into the house, and the electricity it consumes runs the compressor doing the moving. Because it is moving rather than making, it can deliver three or four units of heat per unit of electricity. That ratio is the coefficient of performance.
Nothing else enters the arithmetic. Not the size of the house, not the length of the winter, not the national average. Those change how much heat you need, and they cancel out of the comparison because both machines have to deliver the same amount.
This site rates the heat pump at HSPF2 11.0, a good cold climate unit, and then knocks it down for backup heat. HSPF2 divided by 3.41214 gives a raw COP of 3.22. Assuming 10% of the season's heat comes from electric resistance strips running at COP 1.0 brings the effective figure to 2.64. That is the number used on every page here.
What it costs per unit of heat in every state
The table sorts by how far ahead the heat pump is, best first. Both columns are the cost of putting one kilowatt hour of heat into the house, so they are directly comparable.
| State | Electricity $/kWh | Fuel price | Gas $/kWh heat | Heat pump $/kWh heat | Cheaper to run | By |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | 0.125 | 1.887 | 0.0678 | 0.0473 | Heat pump | 30% |
| Hawaii | 0.415 | 5.175 | 0.1859 | 0.1572 | Heat pump | 15% |
| North Carolina | 0.139 | 1.712 | 0.0615 | 0.0528 | Heat pump | 14% |
| Washington | 0.138 | 1.614 | 0.0580 | 0.0521 | Heat pump | 10% |
| Missouri | 0.120 | 1.394 | 0.0501 | 0.0453 | Tie | tie |
| Texas | 0.157 | 1.752 | 0.0629 | 0.0594 | Tie | tie |
| Arizona | 0.157 | 1.699 | 0.0610 | 0.0595 | Tie | tie |
| Georgia | 0.141 | 1.505 | 0.0541 | 0.0534 | Tie | tie |
| South Carolina | 0.155 | 1.623 | 0.0583 | 0.0586 | Tie | tie |
| Oregon | 0.147 | 1.525 | 0.0548 | 0.0559 | Tie | tie |
| Virginia | 0.157 | 1.557 | 0.0559 | 0.0595 | Tie | tie |
| Alabama | 0.161 | 1.590 | 0.0571 | 0.0610 | Tie | tie |
| Delaware | 0.166 | 1.588 | 0.0570 | 0.0631 | Current system | 11% |
| Kentucky | 0.136 | 1.276 | 0.0458 | 0.0517 | Current system | 13% |
| Mississippi | 0.144 | 1.334 | 0.0479 | 0.0545 | Current system | 14% |
| Tennessee | 0.129 | 1.146 | 0.0412 | 0.0490 | Current system | 19% |
| Kansas | 0.146 | 1.274 | 0.0457 | 0.0554 | Current system | 21% |
| Nebraska | 0.117 | 1.010 | 0.0363 | 0.0444 | Current system | 22% |
| Oklahoma | 0.126 | 1.041 | 0.0374 | 0.0477 | Current system | 28% |
| West Virginia | 0.146 | 1.192 | 0.0428 | 0.0553 | Current system | 29% |
| Massachusetts | 0.308 | 2.493 | 0.0895 | 0.1169 | Current system | 31% |
| Utah | 0.131 | 1.051 | 0.0377 | 0.0495 | Current system | 31% |
| Iowa | 0.127 | 1.007 | 0.0362 | 0.0482 | Current system | 33% |
| Wyoming | 0.129 | 1.002 | 0.0360 | 0.0489 | Current system | 36% |
| North Dakota | 0.112 | 0.840 | 0.0302 | 0.0424 | Current system | 41% |
| South Dakota | 0.131 | 0.948 | 0.0340 | 0.0497 | Current system | 46% |
| New Hampshire | 0.264 | 1.835 | 0.0659 | 0.1000 | Current system | 52% |
| California | 0.327 | 2.224 | 0.0799 | 0.1241 | Current system | 55% |
| Pennsylvania | 0.202 | 1.370 | 0.0492 | 0.0766 | Current system | 56% |
| Vermont | 0.233 | 1.564 | 0.0562 | 0.0882 | Current system | 57% |
| Nevada | 0.137 | 0.918 | 0.0330 | 0.0521 | Current system | 58% |
| Rhode Island | 0.302 | 2.017 | 0.0724 | 0.1147 | Current system | 58% |
| Wisconsin | 0.183 | 1.186 | 0.0426 | 0.0692 | Current system | 63% |
| Montana | 0.130 | 0.839 | 0.0301 | 0.0492 | Current system | 63% |
| Ohio | 0.175 | 1.128 | 0.0405 | 0.0663 | Current system | 64% |
| District of Columbia | 0.239 | 1.523 | 0.0547 | 0.0905 | Current system | 65% |
| Indiana | 0.161 | 1.011 | 0.0363 | 0.0609 | Current system | 68% |
| Colorado | 0.165 | 1.028 | 0.0369 | 0.0624 | Current system | 69% |
| New Jersey | 0.231 | 1.367 | 0.0491 | 0.0875 | Current system | 78% |
| Connecticut | 0.281 | 1.659 | 0.0596 | 0.1066 | Current system | 79% |
| Illinois | 0.171 | 0.981 | 0.0352 | 0.0648 | Current system | 84% |
| Idaho | 0.122 | 0.665 | 0.0239 | 0.0462 | Current system | 93% |
| New York | 0.286 | 1.559 | 0.0560 | 0.1084 | Current system | 94% |
| Michigan | 0.197 | 1.009 | 0.0362 | 0.0746 | Current system | 106% |
| Alaska | 0.256 | 1.248 | 0.0448 | 0.0971 | Current system | 117% |
Heating season mean for 2025-12, 2026-01, 2026-02. Gas converted from dollars per thousand cubic feet at 1,037 BTU per cubic foot, then divided by 0.95 for furnace efficiency. Six states carry no gas price because EIA has not published a complete season for them, so they sit out this particular comparison and appear on the state index with the fuels they do have.
Where the heat pump wins, and why
The pattern is not about climate. It is about the ratio between two utility bills, and that ratio is set by generation mix, regulation, and how close the state sits to gas production.
The five best states for a heat pump against gas
| State | Electricity $/kWh | Gas $/therm | Heat pump saves |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arkansas | 0.125 | 1.89 | 30% |
| Hawaii | 0.415 | 5.17 | 15% |
| North Carolina | 0.139 | 1.71 | 14% |
| Washington | 0.138 | 1.61 | 10% |
| Missouri | 0.120 | 1.39 | tie |
The five worst
| State | Electricity $/kWh | Gas $/therm | Heat pump costs more |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alaska | 0.256 | 1.25 | 117% |
| Michigan | 0.197 | 1.01 | 106% |
| New York | 0.286 | 1.56 | 94% |
| Idaho | 0.122 | 0.67 | 93% |
| Illinois | 0.171 | 0.98 | 84% |
Notice what is not on the winning list: the states pushing hardest on electrification. Expensive residential electricity is exactly what makes a heat pump expensive to run, and several of the most active policy states have the most expensive electricity in the country.
Four things that change the answer
1. The furnace you are replacing
An older non-condensing furnace at 80% AFUE wastes a fifth of the fuel it burns. Replacing that with the same heat pump moves the breakeven from 2.78 up to 3.30, which flips several states. Read the plate on your furnace before assuming you are in the 95% case.
2. The heat pump you are buying
A builder grade unit at HSPF2 8.0 has a raw COP of 2.34 against 3.22 for a good cold climate machine. That single specification is worth roughly a third of the running cost.
3. Backup heat
The assumption with the largest effect and the least visibility. Electric resistance strips run at COP 1.0, and because you are adding up electricity consumed rather than averaging efficiencies, a small share of heat from the strips costs you a large share of your efficiency. Fifteen percent of heat from backup costs you 27% of your COP. This is covered in full in the field note on backup heat.
4. Your utility tariff
A growing number of utilities offer a reduced winter rate for heat pump customers. The state average used here does not include those, so if your utility has one, your real answer is better than this page suggests. Check before you decide.
The option this comparison points to
In the 33 states where gas wins, the arithmetic is not really arguing for keeping a gas furnace forever. It is arguing for running the heat pump when it is efficient and the furnace when it is not.
That is a dual fuel system, and it is the answer the numbers point at in most of the country, yet almost nobody writes about it. Above the crossover temperature the heat pump has a high COP and wins. Below it, the COP falls, the resistance strips would otherwise engage, and the furnace becomes the cheaper machine. A control that switches between them captures the better half of both.
Full treatment is in dual fuel vs a heat pump alone.
Common questions
Is a heat pump cheaper than gas heat?
Not usually, on running cost alone. Against a 95% AFUE condensing gas furnace, a cold climate heat pump is cheaper to run in 4 of 45 states and more expensive in 33. Against every other common heating fuel, the heat pump wins in almost every state.
Why do other calculators say I will save money?
Most use one national average fuel price instead of your state, and many read the latest monthly EIA gas price, which is inflated in summer because that published figure is revenue divided by volume and summer volume is close to zero.
Does this mean I should not get a heat pump?
No. It means running cost against natural gas is the one place where a heat pump often loses, and you should know that before you sign rather than after. A heat pump also replaces your air conditioner, may qualify for rebates, and cuts emissions in most grids. Those are real and are not in this comparison.
What if I have an old furnace?
Then your comparison is against 80% AFUE rather than 95%, and the breakeven moves from 2.78 to 3.30. Several states flip. Put your own furnace rating into the calculator.
How much does electricity have to fall for a heat pump to win?
For this equipment pairing, your electricity price divided by your gas price per unit of energy has to come in under 2.78 to 1. Your state page gives your current ratio.
How this was checked
Fuel prices are pulled from the EIA public API and averaged over the most recent complete December to February window, using identical months for every state. Summer months are excluded deliberately. EIA's residential price is total revenue divided by total volume, and in summer the fixed monthly customer charge is divided by almost no gas, which inflates the apparent price by up to 114%. That error is documented in the corrections log.
The same rate file drives the calculator, every state page, and every table on this page, so the tool and the writing cannot disagree. Unit conversions were derived twice, once in dollars per unit of chemical energy and once in dollars per delivered BTU, and both give the same threshold.
No verdict is declared inside a 10% margin, because fuel prices move more than that between seasons.
What this page does not cover
Running cost only. This page says nothing about what the equipment costs to buy or install, what rebates or tax credits are available, what financing costs, or what either system does to your emissions.
It also ignores the largest single item in the capital comparison: a heat pump is also an air conditioner. If you would otherwise be buying a furnace and an air conditioner, you are buying one machine instead of two, and that can outweigh several years of running cost difference.
State averages hide real variation between utilities inside a state. If you have your own bills, put your own numbers into the calculator rather than trusting a state mean.
References
Related reading
Run it with your own numbers
State averages hide real differences between utilities. Put your own rates and equipment in.
Open the calculator